Former Simbamanyo Boss Peter Kamya Rushes To Pay Court Filing Fees After Being Exposed


By Uganda Online

Kampala: Former Simbamanyo House boss, Peter Kamya has rushed to pay the court-filling fees after a whistle-blower exposed him.

City lawyers from Walusimbi & Co. Advocates, who also double as representatives of Meera Investments in the property row between Equity Bank and Architect Peter Kamya of Simbamanyo Estates petitioned the High Court seeking an audit of the court filing fees, indicating that Kamya evaded court fees.

“We are in receipt of a letter written by M/s Walusimbi & Co. Advocates to the Deputy Registrar – Commercial court on 30th November 2021 regarding payment of filing fees,” reads part of the letter from Kamya’s lawyers of Byenkya, Kihika & Co. Advocates.

Letter From Walusimbi &Co Advocates Exposing Kamya

“As a result of the contents of the letter, our client obtained a fresh assessment from the cashier – commercial court for filing fees, and the same was computed at Shs 81,750,000. The said amount has since been paid by our client as filing fees,” the letter reads.

Kamya’s Response

In August 2012, Equity Bank Uganda and Equity Bank Kenya extended a loan worth $10 million to Simbamanyo to finance the construction of a hotel in Luzira and also to take over Kamya’s prior loan from Shelter Afrique. The funds came from both Equity Kenya and Uganda.

Kamya continued to receive money from the rent payments but did not service his loan obligations as required.

As a result, Equity Bank Uganda Limited began foreclosure proceedings against Simbamanyo to recover the outstanding loan.

The bank seized Simbamanyo House and Afrique Suites Hotel on Mutungo Hill in Kampala last year after the city tycoon Peter Kamya and his Simbamanyo Estates failed to clear loans to a tune of $10.8m (about Shs40 billion).

The High Court recently ruled that Kamya should pay a total of Shs1.3 billion as legal costs to Equity Bank (Shs600m), Meera Investments (Shs400m), and Luwaluwa Investments (Shs300m). Kamya is again seeking legal redress over a matter that was deemed closed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *